Embedded Files
Planning Board Decisions, Land Use Group Delays Reveal Stress Points on Growth and Oversight
Key Takeaways
Planning Board nominations expose competing expectations: experience vs. new energy, proactive vision needed
Land Use Working Group’s stalled appointment process underscores ongoing gaps in ecological and resident input
Board flagged procedural confusion on school budget and governance, raising concerns for fiscal oversight
Land Use, Housing, and Growth at the Forefront
Board discussions made clear that appointments to the Planning Board and Land Use Working Group will shape Concord’s approach to zoning, density, and town character. While technical experience was valued in Planning Board picks (Bogosian and Dorothy), the debate exposed dissatisfaction with recent focus on MBTA housing mandates over broader planning and parking challenges. Some concern remains over the broader implications for growth and development policy.
Ecological Representation and Process Gaps
Amid committee shuffle, the at-large Land Use Working Group seat was left open after calls for more balance and deeper inclusion of natural resources expertise. Public comments summed up wider frustration: “it would be sad if natural resources and open space was not included in this land use planning committee.” The delay highlighted both the challenge and the necessity of integrating ecological perspectives, as well as the complications of orchestrating appointments with limited seats.
Fiscal Oversight and Procedural Ambiguity
In quieter but consequential business, board members noted confusion over school committee fund transfers and the handling of excess and deficiency funds. While details were limited in the minutes, earlier transcripts revealed uncertainty about the approval chain, pointing to larger risks for financial planning and public trust, especially if regulatory processes are misinterpreted.
Other actions
Accepted minutes (with April 14 and May 5 removed) and routine warrants
Accepted donations and gifts, including for town events and cemetery improvements
Approved Public Works Week proclamation and dissolved completed Main Street task force
Issued tour guide and liquor licenses for specific events
Reappointed Brad Hubbard-Nelson to the Climate Action Committee
Comments from the Public or Staff (Highlights)
Ellen Quackenbush: Voiced concern about absence of natural resources voices on Land Use Working Group
Tanya Gailus: Warned that “open space” isn’t a substitute for ecological preservation; supported NRC liaison
Mark Gailus: Reminded Board of transparency and open meeting law on document sharing
Votes Taken
Enter executive session to discuss property negotiations – Passed (Unanimous, roll call)
Approve revised consent agenda (minus Planning Board nominees, specific minutes) – Passed (Unanimous)
Reappoint Brad Hubbard-Nelson to Climate Action Committee – Passed (Unanimous)
Nominate Mary Hartman as Select Board rep to Land Use Working Group – Passed (4-0-1), McKennitt abstained
Quote to Reflect On
“Open space is not necessarily the same as ecological natural preservation and natural resources. So I'm glad that you're at least looking forward to collaboration with the natural resources commission and their interests.” – Tanya Gailus
Go Direct to the Source
The meeting summary above is auto-generated and may contain errors (report them here). You can access this meeting's official minutes and recording below.
Official Meeting Minutes
Official Meeting Minutes
May 19, 2025 - Concord Select Board - minutes.pdfOfficial Meeting Materials
Official Meeting Materials
May 19, 2025 - Concord Select Board - meeting materials.pdfVideo of the Meeting
Video of the Meeting
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse